Star Reviewer Awards
The Journal of Engineering Education established the Star Reviewer Award in 2017 to recognize outstanding JEE reviewers.
Reviewers who have completed three or more reviews in last year for JEE and who Editorial Board members nominate based on the quality of their reviews are considered for this award. The selection committee, volunteers from the JEE Editorial Board, read the reviews submitted by reviewers who meet these criteria, looking for features of outstanding reviews: review includes a summary of what the article was about; review provides positive ways forward (not just a critique); review provides notes to the editor; review includes some discussion of reviewer positionality; review demonstrates critical thinking about the manuscript; and review is detailed.
JEE Reviewers who provide this type of feedback are invaluable in cultivating our community of scholars in engineering education, and we are pleased to recognize their efforts.
- Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
- Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia
- Glenda Stump, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Martin Reisslein, Arizona State University
- Geoffrey Herman, University of Illinois
- Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University
- Noah Schroeder, Wright State University
- Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University
- Catherine Berdanier, Penn State University
- Andrea Goncher, University of Florida
- James Huff, Harding University
- Samantha Brunhaver, Arizona State University
- Andrea Mazzurco, Swineburne Institute of Technology
- Cassandra McCall, Utah State University
- Angela Minchiello, Utah State University
- Jacki Rohde, Purdue University
- Stephen Secules, Florida International University
Star Reviewer Awards
The Journal of Engineering Education established the Star Reviewer Award in 2017 to recognize outstanding JEE reviewers.
Reviewers who have completed three or more reviews in last year for JEE and who Editorial Board members nominate based on the quality of their reviews are considered for this award. The selection committee, volunteers from the JEE Editorial Board, read the reviews submitted by reviewers who meet these criteria, looking for features of outstanding reviews: review includes a summary of what the article was about; review provides positive ways forward (not just a critique); review provides notes to the editor; review includes some discussion of reviewer positionality; review demonstrates critical thinking about the manuscript; and review is detailed.
JEE Reviewers who provide this type of feedback are invaluable in cultivating our community of scholars in engineering education, and we are pleased to recognize their efforts.
- Joachim Walther, University of Georgia
- Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia
- Glenda Stump, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Martin Reisslein, Arizona State University
- Geoffrey Herman, University of Illinois
- Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University
- Noah Schroeder, Wright State University
- Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University
- Catherine Berdanier, Penn State University
- Andrea Goncher, University of Florida
- James Huff, Harding University
- Samantha Brunhaver, Arizona State University
- Andrea Mazzurco, Swineburne Institute of Technology
- Cassandra McCall, Utah State University
- Angela Minchiello, Utah State University
- Jacki Rohde, Purdue University
- Stephen Secules, Florida International University
